"Interactive" has become a word that means very little. A tour where you tap Next to hear the following paragraph is not interactive; you're operating a media player. What makes a walking tour genuinely interactive is that it asks you to do something and the tour changes depending on what you do.
In short: a tour is interactive when it responds to you. Families, work groups and locals get the most from that; a solo traveller who wants to learn is often better off with a narrated tour. Here's how to tell the two apart.
How can you tell if a walking tour is really interactive?
Ask one question: does the tour respond to you?
If you can complete it without looking up, it's an audio tour with buttons. If you have to find something, answer something, or choose a direction before it will continue, it's interactive.
Neither is better in the abstract. But they suit different people, and the word covers both, which is how groups end up with the wrong one.
What levels of interactivity are there?
Four, from a play button to choices that change the route.
Level one: is it just a play button?
Audio triggered by location. You walk, it talks. Comfortable, informative, and entirely passive, which is exactly right for a solo traveller who wants to learn something and not be asked questions.
Level two: is there a quiz along the way?
Questions between stops that don't change anything. A little more engaging than pure audio; a little like a worksheet if the questions are generic.
Level three: do puzzles unlock the route?
You can't reach the next stop until you've solved this one. That's a real change: it makes the group look at the building rather than through it, and it turns walking into a shared task.
Level four: do your choices change the route?
Branching stories where a decision sends you down one street rather than another. Rare, because it's expensive to write and test, and genuinely interesting when it's done properly.
When is an interactive tour the better choice?
For groups, children, second visits and anything you want to remember.
Groups. This is the main one. Four people listening to separate audio tracks are four people alone together; four people arguing about how many lions are on a gate are a group.
Children. A child will not listen to twenty minutes of narration. A child will count things, look for things and press buttons.
Memory. You remember what you worked out. You forget most of what you were told, which is not a criticism of guides; it's how attention works.
Second visits. If you know the city, being told about the cathedral is dull. Being asked something specific about the cathedral you'd never noticed isn't.
When is an interactive tour the wrong choice?
When you want depth, a quiet solo walk, or no feeling of being tested.
Depth. An interactive tour can't teach you as much as a good narrated one. It trades information for attention. If your group wants to understand the city, take a guide or an audio tour and accept that it's passive.
Solo walkers who want to think. Being asked to count columns interrupts the drifting state that makes a solo walk good.
People who dislike being tested. A route with a score can feel like an exam. Formats where the puzzles are optional handle this better than ones that block progress.
What should you ask before booking?
Phones per team, time limit, local questions, skipping and language.
Does it need one phone per person or per team? Per team is better for a group and is a good sign about the design.
Is there a time limit? A clock changes an interactive tour from relaxed to pressured, and stops you having lunch halfway.
Are the questions written for this city or generated from map data? Count-the-benches questions are the tell.
Can you skip a stop? A route that traps you at a puzzle behind scaffolding is worse than one that lets you move on.
What language does it genuinely run in? Wordplay doesn't translate, and a badly translated puzzle is unsolvable rather than just clumsy.
Which format suits your group?
Interactive for families, work groups and locals; audio for a solo learner.
Alone, wanting to learn: audio tour. Interactive gets in the way.
Two people on a weekend: either, though puzzles give you something to do together rather than beside each other.
A family: interactive, clearly. There is no version of a narrated tour that holds a nine-year-old.
A work group: interactive, in teams, because the point is that colleagues talk.
Someone who lives there: interactive, because you already know the narration.
Where can you play an interactive walking tour?
You can see which cities have routes and pick one nearby or where you're travelling. The page on how the game works describes what the tour asks of you, which is the fastest way to judge whether it's the right level of interactive for your group.
For several teams walking the same route at once, there's a setup for companies and groups.
Frequently asked questions
What makes a walking tour interactive?
The tour responds to what you do. If you can finish it without looking up, it's narration with buttons.
Is an interactive tour better than an audio tour?
Not better, different. Audio teaches more; interactive holds a group's attention and suits children far better.
How long do they take?
Most city-centre routes take 1.5 to 2 hours, longer with children or a large group.
Do you need one phone each?
No, and per team is better: it keeps people talking to each other instead of to their own screens.
Are they good for children?
Much better than narrated tours, from about eight upwards, or five with an adult reading.
What if you get stuck at a puzzle?
Good formats give hints on request and let you skip. Check that before booking, because building work does occasionally hide an answer.
In short
Ask whether the tour responds to you. If it does, it's interactive and it suits groups, families and people who already know the city. If it doesn't, it's an audio tour, and for a solo walker wanting to learn, that's the better purchase. For the wider comparison, we've written about self-guided walking tours.
Not sure which level suits your group? Ask through the contact page.
Secrets of …
Discover the stories behind the facades. For everyone. See the games ›
