Blog

Team Building Games That Actually Work (And The Ones That Don't)

Four colleagues walking together across a canal bridge in Amsterdam during a team building game

Most people have sat through at least one team building game they wanted no part of. Trust falls, forced sharing, an icebreaker that asks you to name a fruit that represents your personality. The activity itself is rarely the problem. The problem is usually a mismatch between the game and the group it was picked for.

In short: pick the game for the group you actually have, split larger groups into small teams that play in parallel, keep it to two or three hours, and skip anything that asks people to be vulnerable in front of colleagues. This is a practical guide to choosing better, with no promise that a two-hour activity will fix a team, because it won't.

What can a team building game do, and what can't it?

It can start conversations between colleagues; it can't fix a team that is unhappy for real reasons.

A good activity gives colleagues a reason to talk to each other about something that isn't work. That's genuinely useful, especially for teams that are partly remote, recently merged, or have grown fast enough that half the room doesn't know the other half.

What it can't do is repair a broken team. If people are unhappy about workload, pay, or a manager, an afternoon of games will read as a distraction, and everyone will notice. That's worth being honest about before booking anything.

Which game suits your group size?

Small groups can do almost anything; larger groups need small teams playing in parallel.

What works for up to eight people?

A small group can do things that need everyone in one conversation: a cooking workshop, an escape room, a shared meal with a structured activity. With eight or fewer, nobody can hide, which is mostly a good thing.

What works for eight to thirty people?

This is the size where a single-room activity starts to fail. Someone always ends up standing at the back holding a coat. The fix is to split into small teams of three to five that do the same thing in parallel and compare results afterwards. City games, quizzes and outdoor challenges all work this way.

What works for more than thirty people?

At this size you need something that scales without a facilitator per group. Activities where each team runs itself from an app or a printed route work well; anything that needs a trainer speaking to everyone at once will lose the room.

What types of team building games are there, and who do they suit?

Five main types: problem-solving, outdoor city games, creative workshops, sports and office quizzes.

Who are problem-solving games for?

Escape rooms, puzzle hunts, mystery formats. These suit teams who like a challenge and don't mind competing. They fall flat with people who feel put on the spot, so it helps if teams are mixed rather than letting the same three people solve everything.

Who are outdoor and city-based games for?

Walking routes with puzzles at each stop. The advantage is practical: no room to book, no fixed start time, and people talk while they walk, which is easier than talking across a table. The disadvantages are weather and mobility: check whether anyone in the group would struggle with a few kilometres on foot.

Who are creative workshops for?

Cooking, pottery, improvisation, music. These work well for groups that already get on and want a relaxed afternoon. They work less well as a first activity for people who don't know each other, because the awkwardness has nowhere to go.

Who are sports and physical challenges for?

Effective for the people who are into it and quietly miserable for those who aren't. If you pick this, make sure there is a genuine non-participating role that isn't just watching.

Are quizzes and office games worth it?

Cheap, low effort, and fine for an hour on a Friday. Nobody remembers them a month later, which is fine if that wasn't the point.

Which team building games make people cringe?

Mostly three things: forced sharing, unwanted physical contact and events that eat into personal time.

Forced emotional sharing. Asking colleagues to name a personal fear or a formative childhood moment crosses a line that a lot of people don't want crossed at work.

Physical contact people didn't agree to. Trust falls and human knots. Some teams enjoy them; assume yours doesn't unless you know otherwise.

Activities that run into personal time. An evening event is a request, not a given. People with childcare, a commute, or a second job will remember being asked.

The simplest test: would you be comfortable if a new colleague on their second day had to do this?

How do you plan a team building day that works?

Check diets and mobility early, share the schedule, mix the teams and keep it short.

Ask about dietary requirements and mobility before you book, not the week after. Give people the actual schedule in advance, including when it ends, so they can plan the rest of their day. Mix the teams deliberately rather than letting people cluster with the colleagues they already eat lunch with, since that's the entire point of the exercise.

And keep it shorter than you think it needs to be. A two-hour activity followed by an optional drink beats a full day that people are counting down.

Where does a city game fit?

A city game sits in the outdoor problem-solving category: teams of up to four people per phone (The Syndicate outdoor escape game: two to five) walk a route through the centre, solving puzzles tied to what they're looking at. It scales well because each team is self-guided, and it doesn't need a fixed start time, which helps when half the group is arriving by train.

You can see which cities have routes and pick one near the office, or make it part of a team trip. The page on how the game works explains the format in a couple of minutes if you want to check it fits before proposing it.

For larger groups there is a dedicated setup for companies and groups, including invoicing and a shared start for everyone.

Frequently asked questions

How long should a team building activity be?

Two to three hours is enough for most teams. Full days work only when there is travel involved and people knew in advance.

What group size works best?

Small teams: up to four people per phone for a city game, two to five for The Syndicate. Larger groups should be split into several teams doing the same activity in parallel.

How do you include people who don't like games?

Choose something with a real task rather than a performance, keep participation genuinely optional, and avoid activities that single individuals out in front of everyone.

Do team building games actually improve collaboration?

They help people who don't normally speak get a first conversation out of the way. Whether that lasts depends on what happens back at work, not on the activity.

What if it rains?

For outdoor formats, light rain is usually fine and heavy rain is worth postponing. Check whether the activity you book can be moved at short notice.

How far in advance should you book?

Two to three weeks for a medium-sized group is comfortable. The bigger constraint is usually finding a date that works, not availability.

In short: choose for the group you have

Pick the activity for the group you actually have, split large groups into small teams, keep it short, and skip anything that asks people to be vulnerable in front of colleagues. If you want a closer look at one format, we've written about using a city game for team building in more detail.

Planning something for a specific group and not sure what fits? Send us the details through the contact page and we'll tell you honestly whether it's a good match.

Sources

Background on team building as a practice: Team building on Wikipedia.